The service tax levy would be 10.3% and would also apply to additional services such as those offering preferential locations for flats in multi-storey buildings where flats in each floor are priced at a premium due to their location. This too has been described as a service and hence taxable, according to the proposal which was tabled in Parliament on Friday by finance minister Pranab Mukherjee. The premium is typically levied on categories such as flats or apartments that are above a certain floor rise or have other high value locations such as being in front of a garden or a sea or any other preferred locality.

"The proposal is to tax construction if the entire payment for the flat is made before completion of construction," said consulting firm RSM Astute executive director K H Viswanathan. "This would increase the cost of the apartment and may discourage potential buyers." The service tax would be 10% on 33% of the price of the apartment, while on the remaining 67%, tax won't be levied.

Till now, for all apartments under construction, customers paid in instalments based on plinth level construction and also on the progress in building activity. Banks too lent money to the customers according to the requirement of the builder. Now most developers would ask customers to pay the entire value of the building if they sought to lock in at a certain value. This would mean paying the entire sum before the construction. Typically, in cities such as Mumbai, where there is a pressure on space and hence apartments and flats are much sought after, customers booking for flats in an under-construction building, is very common. "The service tax and excise duty hike on cement would increase the overall cost of apartment by about 10%," said Dharmesh Jain, managing director of Nirmal Lifestyles, a Mumbai-based developer. "It's a negative step and we are considering to meet the finance minister to plead for a relook on this measure," he added.

But there are other positive measures that the Budget proposes such as allowing pending projects to be completed within a period of 5 years instead of 4 years, for claiming deduction of profits, as one time interim relief. There is also a suggestion that the commercial area included in a housing project would now be 3% of the aggregate built-up area of the housing project or 5,000 sq. ft, whichever is higher, compared to the existing limit of 2% and 2,000 sq.ft. respectively. This would help developers and real estate companies to make their projects more viable.